Flow vs. APEX: Which Salesforce Automation Tool is Right for You?

Date: August 4th, 2025

A visual guide to choosing between declarative and programmatic automation in Salesforce.

When customizing business processes in Salesforce, choosing between Flow, Apex, or other tools depends on a combination of complexity, maintainability, performance, and governance requirements.



✅ Salesforce Flow (Low-Code Tool)

Pros:

  • No/Low Code: Admins and junior developers can create automations without writing code.

  • Quick to Deploy: Ideal for fast prototyping and non-complex business logic.

  • Declarative Debugging: Visual debugging and error messages are easier to interpret.

  • Governance-Friendly: Doesn’t count against Apex code limits (except indirectly).

  • Versioning Support: Flow versions can be maintained and activated independently.

  • Integration Ready: Can call Apex, external services (via HTTP), and sub-flows.

Cons:

  • Limited Logic Complexity: Becomes hard to manage or unreadable with complex branching, loops, or large-scale data operations.

  • Performance: Slower for bulk processing and can hit Flow element limits (e.g., 2,000 elements executed per transaction).

  • Testing: No automated test class enforcement (unlike Apex); hard to write regression tests.

  • UI Limitations: Screen Flows are limited compared to custom LWC/UIs.


✅ Apex Code (Pro-Code Tool)

Pros:

  • Powerful & Flexible: Can handle any business logic, including complex calculations, integrations, and asynchronous processing.

  • Bulkification Control: Better suited for high-volume record processing.

  • Better Error Handling: Fine-grained try/catch and custom exception types.

  • Testability: Mandatory test coverage, unit test structure, and mocking enable robust regression practices.

  • Code Reuse: Utility classes, trigger handlers, and services make logic reusable and maintainable at scale.

Cons:

  • Code Maintenance: Requires developer skills, version control, and proper deployment pipelines.

  • Governance: Subject to org-wide Apex limits (CPU time, heap size, etc.).

  • Longer Development Time: More effort needed to write, test, and deploy.

  • Overhead: Poorly written Apex can be harder to debug and more prone to scalability issues.


🔁 When to Use Each


🧠 Hybrid Best Practice

In real-world architectures, combining Flow and Apex often yields the best results:

  • Use Flows for orchestration and user-facing decisions.

  • Use Apex as reusable services (invocable methods, trigger handlers) for logic-heavy operations.

  • Favor modularity and separation of concerns.


André Thouin

Web Administrator, musician and Salesforce Administrator.

From nonprofits to financial institutions and government, I’ve led platform adoption, training, and strategic CRM initiatives that strengthened relationships and elevated customer satisfaction.

https://www.crmagile.com
Previous
Previous

The Mystery of Adoption (Part 1)